Handel’s Fairest Dalila

By Miranda Houghton

“In practice, however, the rich theatrical contextualisation tends to shift the focus away from her singing. From a performer’s point-of-view, a summary of her repertoire, and perhaps a separate chapter on her vocal characteristics regarding range, tessitura and their eventual changes, would have been useful, with more musical examples.” So wrote Judit Zsovár in Handel News in 2019. Adverse reviews usually put me off a product, but in this case I decided to purchase and read Berta Joncus’ book, Kitty Clive or the Fair Songster (Boydell Press 2019) as I have read other publications by Berta Joncus and found them not only well-researched but inspiring.

One of my own areas of interest is the “stylistic” process Handel went through in the dying years of Italian opera’s pre-eminence on the London stage. By the time of his death he had established as much of a reputation as a composer of oratorio as he had enjoyed as a foremost composer of opera seria. Very much tied up in that period was John Beard, introduced as a tenor in Handel’s later operas but more significantly the tenor primo uomo in virtually all of Handel’s oratorios. Were Handel’s oratorios a natural progression from dramas set for the stage in the Italian style, or did he (as I believe) invent his own version of “devotional” works, choosing to use his unique ability to express intense emotion through word painting to set biblical dramas? I would particularly like to know if the character of ornamentation in Handel’s oratorios became progressively muted as his company of Italian singers became interspersed with talented British singers of the day, less conversant with the florid excesses of Italian high Baroque, but also because decoration for the aggrandisement of individual singers was considered out of keeping with the biblical subject matter.

One clue is in the sort of voices and the technical ability we imagine singers such as John Beard had. Was he the equivalent of a Lieder singer today, acting purely with the voice, or was he as much of a dramatic singing actors as Kitty Clive clearly was? What Joncus’ book proves is that Kitty Clive was capable of singing in the bel canto style along with the best of the Italians, such was her versatility as a performer. We should not forget that John Beard sang in public entertainment alongside Kitty Clive. Yes, the role of Dalila in Samson was written for Kitty Clive with her arch-rival, Susanna Cibber as seconda donna, yet these two sopranos were also the leading ladies in Gay’s The Beggar’s Opera – in which John Beard also sang. Why is it then that history remembers John Beard as the greatest English tenor of the era, able to move seamlessly between masques, ballad operas and six of Handel’s opera 32 serie to Handel’s dramatic oratorios without any loss of reputation whereas Clive is relegated by posterity to a mere purveyor of bawdy low art? Why is Beard described as a singer whereas Clive is a “songster”?

One is forced to conclude this is due to the fact she was an intelligent and powerful woman who refused to be manipulated by men. She was in later years criticised for her looks, yet in portraits of her as a young woman, she is no less agreeable than Cuzzoni, Faustina and indeed Strada Del Po, Handel’s great Italian leading ladies. Clive was a star for a long time, suggesting her charisma and comedic talent transcended the requirement to look young and pretty on stage. As contemporary reviews show us, she also won the right to be judged as a singer, known for her sparkling delivery of music by Handel, Purcell, Arne, Bononcini and her ability to parody the day’s leading Italian opera singers. My point is she would have risen above criticism when being judged purely for her exceptional talent as a singer.

Contrary to Ms Zsár’s contention that Berta Joncus tells us little about the quality of Clive’s vocal prowess, her fach and her musicianship, the detailed research into the wide variety of vehicles which the most famous actormanagers created for her offer a clear indication of Clive’s star quality. After all, to be renowned for her brilliant mimicry of the Italian singers of the day is no mean feat.

Contemporary sources tell us that Clive was able to enliven an otherwise dull performance with singing which was fresh and direct. In one of London’s most popular ballad operas, Damon and Phillida, Clive was given an Italian da capo aria from one of London’ s most celebrated operas, Camilla by Bononcini. To sing this and other arias from the Italian high Baroque, she will have relied on bel canto technique like the finest Italian singers in The Royal Academy. Her musical director, Carey wrote a cantata for her which captures the fashionable Neapolitan writing of the day with its suave melodies and demanding melismas. We suspect it was Carey who trained her in her famous exaggerated parodies of Italian singers with extravagant gestures and elaborate coloratura on prepositions. In interludes in ballad operas and masques, Clive performed Handel operatic arias as well as Cuzzoni or Strada Del Po. Fielding drew on her versatility when he burlesqued Handel’s oratorio Deborah. Drury Lane’s Opera of Operas gave Clive her first chance to extravagantly burlesque Italian opera, flexing her vocal muscle with runs up to high B.

As Professor Wendy Heller wrote in her review of Joncus’ book in Early Music America, “For Clive, as Joncus shows, it all began with an extraordinary singing voice that allowed her to “straddle” high and low rhetorical registers. Clive could compete with (or even mock) the best Italian sopranos; she could use the lower part of her voice to excel in popular songs and raunchy ballad operas on one night and employ her secure vocal technique the next day to become a goddess in a lofty masque…. Kitty Clive, or the Fair Songster opens up entirely new ways of thinking about how a singer might wield her voice. Joncus does not so much invoke the abstract concept of “Voice,” but rather helps the reader imagine the specific grain of a very specific instrument with which Clive was identified throughout her long career. What is particularly fascinating is the extent to which Clive’s musicianship and ability as a singer became the catalyst for all that followed. Joncus persuasively shows how her musical skill helped her excel in the spoken theater, pointing out the extent to which control of tempo, rhythm, and melody are essential for stage speech, a point that musicians and actors rarely acknowledge today.”

Kitty Clive or The Fair Songster by Berta Joncus (Boydell Press 2019) is available from all good bookshops.

Book Review-Berta Joncus: Kitty Clive, or The Fair Songster (Boydell & Brewer, 2019, 541 pp.)

Judit Zsovár

The fame of Catherine (Kitty) Clive (1711-85), star actress at English theatre Drury Lane for more than twenty years, was in great part due to her singing. Berta Joncus’s book offers an exhaustive study of Clive’s character and work; her roles and songs; her rise and fall; her feminist ambitions; her public image of chastity and the contrasting reality behind it. It details her collaborations with stage partners like Hannah Pritchard and John Beard as well as actor-manager-playwrights like Colley Cibber, Henry Carrey, James Miller and David Garrick. London’s theatrical life, including the relations between playhouses and Italian opera companies, are pictured, together with the political driving forces behind them. Clive’s seasons are dissected, as are her rivalries with Susannah Cibber and Lavinia Fenton, and scandals like the Drury Lane Actors’ Rebellion (1743-44) and the Green Room gossip (1745-46), both destroyers of Clive’s reputation. In addition, masterly analyses of portraits, in paintings, drawings and porcelain figurines, serve as ‘tangible’ complements to the author’s storytelling, excellently showing the changing nature of Clive’s public persona over time.

In terms of serious songs, apart from Purcell and De Fesch, in the 1730s Clive performed simplified English-language versions of arias from Handel’s Ottone, Poro, Partenope and Alexander’s Feast. Besides contributing a song for Clive’s benefit in 1740, Handel involved her in oratorio performances of L’Allegro, il Penseroso ed il Moderato and Samson as well as the Messiah (1743 revival). After 1750, to retain the public’s attention, Clive gave up serious songs and turned to satire, mocking Italian operas and singers’ accents in Handelian English oratorios, targeting Caterina Galli among others.

The title of the book stresses Clive as a singer of ballads, masques and popular songs, rather than as an actress (of Shakespeare, Milton and Dryden in particular). Emphasising the importance of Clive’s musical vein in her career and success, the introduction holds out the prospect of a vocal portrait contextualised within her plays, theatrical environment and career. In practice, however, the rich theatrical contextualisation tends to shift the focus away from her singing. From a performer’s point-of-view, a summary of her repertoire, and perhaps a separate chapter on her vocal characteristics regarding range, tessitura and their eventual changes, would have been useful, with more musical examples. Her songs and arias could have been discussed more specifically from a vocal musico-technical perspective, rather than largely from a compositional point-of-view. Unfortunately, contemporary accounts say little about Clive’s exact vocal quality, i.e. tone, flexibility, colouring, volume, etc.; and Frances Brooke’s patriotic claim that Clive was ‘infinitely superior’ to major opera star Regina Mingotti (Porpora’s pupil and Faustina’s worthy rival), when caricaturing her performance style, seems to refer to Clive’s imitative acting skills and English diction, rather than her vocal capacities.

On the whole, however, Joncus’s work is a monumental, worthy, many-sided and richly detailed monograph, providing a strong portrait of Clive as a distinguished actress-songster in Handel’s times.

Dr Judit Zsovár is a soprano and musicologist. Her book on Anna Maria Strada is to be published early in 2020 by Peter Lang.